<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>blog@insidesystems.net: PostgreSQL scaling on 6.2 and 7.0</title>
    <link>http://blog.insidesystems.net/articles/2007/04/11/postgresql-scaling-on-6-2-and-7-0</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>PostgreSQL scaling on 6.2 and 7.0</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;My previous posts have documented the utterly insane lack of scalability of PostgreSQL (at least according to that particular metric) on FreeBSD 6.2.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I ran the same test, on the same machine, using 7.0 with the 4BSD and the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ULE&lt;/span&gt; schedulers.  Postgres was tuned as in the previous posts, and &lt;span class="caps"&gt;WITNESS&lt;/span&gt;, INVARIANTS and all malloc debugging options were off.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Results:
&lt;img src="http://blog.insidesystems.net/files/postgres-fbsd-62-70ule-704b.png"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Hopefully nobody will extrapolate this to mean more than it really does (it&amp;#8217;s just one test, but it&amp;#8217;s one that happens to matter to me.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:40:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:2357eb5b-6e89-4e5f-8cba-2c3d7778ebb3</guid>
      <author>Kevin Way</author>
      <link>http://blog.insidesystems.net/articles/2007/04/11/postgresql-scaling-on-6-2-and-7-0</link>
      <category>FreeBSD</category>
      <category>System Administration</category>
      <category>PostgreSQL</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
